I know you said you don't want to consider Adobe CC, but... I switched to Adobe CC from FCS3 a little over a year ago, having been editiing on every version of FCP from version 1 up, and am very glad I did. There are improvements and functional additions in Premiere CC that are not in Premiere 6 that I use everyday, such as Direct Linking to Adobe Speedgrade, etc. These differences and improvements also fix some faults and what I felt were missing features and stability issues in Premiere 6 and below. I believe Adobe CC is the Final Cut 8 that many working editors were looking for, before Apple decided to take another route with FCP-X.
Adobe After Effects CC 2017 Design animated graphics and visual effects at professional level with Adobe's complete creative composition and animation software, Adobe. Popular Alternatives to Adobe Premiere Pro for Windows, Mac, Linux, iPad, Web and more. Explore 63 apps like Adobe Premiere Pro, all suggested. Dec 13, 2016. To help you sort things out and find the right answer for yourself, Australian-based filmmaker Justin Brown of Primal Video shares some of his personal top. May 21, 2017. There are many polarizing debates in the world of technology and video editing, and software is no exception. Final Cut Pro X and Adobe Premiere Pro are some of the most popular tools for the job and therefore both have their diehard fans. But if you want to make an objective decision about which to use. May 18, 2015. Adobe Premiere and Final Cut Pro are the two leading non-linear digital editing platforms in the consumer market. Filmmakers love to debate. On the older platform. To help you choose the best platform for you, we've broken it down into some of the most basic pros and cons of Premiere versus Final Cut.
Here is a video that showcases Premiere CC on the new MacPro, slicing through 4K video: and here is a video that shows how all the components of Adobe CC working in the collaborative production environment: What works for me may not work for you, but I wanted to give you some more food for thought. MtD Mar 29, 2014 10:51 AM. I'm not sure what you are asking, but - the switch to Adobe was pretty painless.
Since the editing paradigm is the same as FCP7, it is really the task of learning the locations of buttons and the keyboard shortcuts. There is an option in Premiere preferences that allow you to use the same keyboard shortcuts that are in FCP7, in Premiere. I tried that for a month or so and then switched to the native shortcuts, to better get a feel of how the software engineers intended the system to be used.
I keep a copy of FCP7 running and if I need to work on a legacy project, I can open it there and export a XML of the sequence, and open that XML in Premiere. Fairbanks Scale Serial Number Chart more. When I was using FCP, I did most of my effects in After Effects anyway, so I was familiar with Adobe. Oddly, there is very little in common between AE shortcuts and PrePro shortcuts. Regarding the subscription model - I get that it is not for everybody.
There are options - including FCP-X, or bunkering an FCP7 system and using it with additional software to convert new formats into FCP friendly codecs. MtD Mar 29, 2014 12:04 PM. Final Cut Studio 3 (which includes FCP7) has been discontinued for a few years now. It is not supported by Apple and they have no reason to ensure that new OSX versions don't break the software. It is dead software at this point.
Those of use who have used it for years keep on with it because switching is painful and we are still quick enough to make it work very well. If I was looking to purchase software for a long term relationship, I would not go there. I have used PP 5.5 and PP 6 as well as PP CC. I agree with MtD. The CC version is much better.
It is stable enough to work reliably with long gop formats and I'm now using it to do simple fast turn around projects where the source material is AVCHD, H.264, etc. I suppose when my MacPro dies and apple has moved onto the next version of OSX, I'll probably be forced into a solidly Adobe workflow. X Mar 29, 2014 1:03 PM. Hey, I love FCP and FCP7 in particular. Anyone could easily make a living using FCP7 and FCS3...
The FCP7 workflow is currently still viable and usable in a collaborative environment - but it is hanging on by the skin of its teeth. It requires a lot of third party help to fit in with current creative workflow expectations. The problem is FCP7 is dead.It is what it is and it won't progress any further - while the post production world, and the hardware that is used - both in post and in computing in general- is changing by the micro second. So as time goes by, it is unable to capitalize on the available improved hardware (being a 32 bit application, for example), and cannot natively work with new production acquisition formats. The candle is burning on both ends.